Maybe it is just in managing threads and drawing the UI, but at least for me.it works significantly better at that job.This article outlines Troubleshooting methods and frequently asked questions for when DAW mode on a StudioLive Series III console will not connect to your DAW software through UCNET MIDI.īefore continuing you will need to be sure you are using the latest Universal Control and Firmware for your StudioLive: Using any other DAW I've tried with basically the same processing for the monitor controller forces me to use a bigger buffer. And it can run Reaper alongside another DAW as a monitor controller. The point is that my computer isn't particularly new, nor is it HEDT. WaveLab 11 is almost the same story, except that it's set up to use ReaRoute as its sound card by default because I actually use it. The story was basically the same with Pro Tools, but I don't have that anymore because of their stupid subscription-based licensing. Of course, Reaper doesn't do everything Live does. Switching from Live to Reaper was not a subtle difference. It's also stable to just leave running, often for weeks at a time. Right now, the low-latency version of my monitoring reaper session (7 armed input tracks in a group, 4 armed tracks as output busses, 14 non-bypassed plugins) uses about the same CPU and literally 1/20 the RAM that a default session (2 unarmed midi tracks, 2 unarmed audio tracks, 2 send/returns, 1 output bus) of Ableton Live 10 with zero plugins (I know it's old.it was the last version I bought and installed), set to use the same AI, so same buffer.

I agree that there is no best DAW and that they all have their strengths and weaknesses.īut, live processing as fast as possible with plugins appears to be one of Reaper's strengths. The threading policy of the DAW can have an impact, but these days I don't see much difference between DAWs. The fact is performance is dominated by plugins, not the DAW. Aside from contrived cases, it's pretty hard to find a distinct performance advantage in Reaper over other DAWs. I do performance testing routinely with all the major DAWs. Obviously it can be done, and it sounds like it's a great way for you to work. I'm not saying monitoring through a DAW can't be done. There simply aren't any advantages for him to work that way.there are only disadvantages.

But, I wouldn't recommend it as a way for Layer8cake to work. That's why that topic is covered in the recording guide. I absolutely agree there are times where it makes sense to monitor through a DAW. That's why the recording guide lists so many options and why it mentions there are other options that might work better in particular situations. I'll be the first to admit there is no one configuration that works best for everybody.

Presonus studiolive reaper